Home
Buy It Now!
Performance
Reviews
FAQ
About Us
Contact
 
Performance measurements

Speedlane improves the load time for all kinds of Internet connections. There is no easy way of measuring the improvement, since transmission times through the Internet vary widely. Measuring programs mostly display the current throughput and do not actually replicate the user's experience. 
To be fair to the user, we are measuring improvements manually by finding the time it takes to totally load one page. Testing procedures take care of emptying the browser's cache, which would otherwise skew the results. 
Testing is typically done at night, because the heavy load on the Internet during the day makes measurements vary too much. 
We invite all users to do similar tests and will post them on this page. 

Test description: We used Windows95 on a 133 MHz Pentium with a 28.8 modem in a lawyers office. We were accessing the Internet at noon through a CompuServe connection with the built-in Internet Explorer. We measured the load time of complete pages until the loading indicator stopped. Between tests the cache was emptied and Compuserve restarted. Each test was run twice and these are the actual values in seconds measured. 
 

 
Website with Speedlane average without Speedlane average addl. time
www.outpost.com 57 / 52 54.5 67 / 74 70.5 29 %
click on a product 22 / 20 21.0 47 / 30 38.5 83 %
www.quantex.com 61 / 79 70.0 63 / 93 78.0 11 %
Results: Without Speedlane, page load times were higher by an average of 41%

Speedlane test results (2) 

Test description: We used a Windows95 laptop at 133 MHz with a Ricochet wireless modem in Palo Alto. To be more independent of network load we waited until 11:00 pm. The measurements were taken with Internet Explorer 4.0. 

Test procedure
1) Restart system 
2) Log in to Ricochet 
3) Start Explorer 
4) Delete Cache Files 
5) Load www.realitycom.com until 'Done' appears at bottom 
6) Repeat steps 4-5 once 
7) Use Speedlane to set new value for MTU 
8) Go to 1 
 
MaxMTU www.realitycom.com (sec) average compared to minimum
NOT SET 59 / 59 59.0 47.5 %
100 144 / 209 176.5 341 %
300 69 / 116 92.5 131 %
400 41 / 39 40.0 0 %
500 45 / 46 45.5 14 %
592 48 / 50 49.0 23 %
Result: The Windows95 default MaxMTU value resulted in 47.5 % longer retrieval times than the optimum value. 


Speedlane test results (3) 

Test description: The following tests were done at 3:00 am when the load on the Internet is minimal. We used a Windows95 laptop at 133 MHz with a 33.6 modem. Internet Explorer 4.0. Modem compression was turned off.  The times were taken with the help of NetMedic from Vitalsigns. Three websites (speedlane.com, netscape.com, realitycom.com) were accessed and the load time quoted by NetMedic was noted. Every test was repeated three times and the browser cache was emptied in between trials. 
 
MaxMTU = 800
Test1
Test2
Test3
average
compare to minimum
speedlane.com
31.2
30.0
32.2
31.1
0.0
netscape.com
23.3
20.5
26.0
23.3
0.0
realitycom.com
54.5
43.3
36.2
44.7
34.9
MaxMTU = 576
Test1
Test2
Test3
average
compare to minimum
speedlane.com
31.8
35.1
34.9
33.9
9.0
netscape.com
29.0
33.7
29.9
30.9
32.7
realitycom.com
32.8
33.5
33.0
33.1
0.0
MaxMTU = NOT SET
Test1
Test2
Test3
average
compare to minimum
speedlane.com
36.3
46.8
59.1
47.4
52.2
netscape.com
36.9
36.1
40.3
37.8
62.3
realitycom.com
38.4
41.9
55.7
45.3
37.0
average:
50.5
The page load times under Windows95 default conditions were up to 62.3 % longer than with the optimum MaxMTU values. 


Copyright© 1998 Speedlane, Inc. Last updated: March 17, 1998